Thursday, May 3

Inventing The Sky

The following is a collection of notes and conjecture between myself and me over the past month or so. Keep in mind that all is what I have learned in the past and what my ideas about it are.

Musings of a reclusive person:

Ask a kid and an astrophysicist to explain the sky
-different perspectives
-Beauty
looking at something (shooting photons at it...light) changes it's molecular structure

find a way to measure the state of existence without looking at it. such as bombarding it with probes at every degree to measure it's dimensions. if this is possible then 'probing' thoughts is an obtainable goal. What are thoughts made of? broadly defined as matter and energy, perhaps as consciousness grows and channels M&E to condense into a measurable vibration. Thoughts may be more accurately defined as an exception to chemical and physical law. Not to say that it acts outsides these principles, but that it may manipulate these laws unto itself. Meaning those laws create thoughts which in turn create those laws.

big bang structured similar to birth scenario, the universe exists because another universe bumped against nothing...similar to man and woman coming together to make something where nothing existed before (nothing in the sense that it may not be able to be probed or seen by lower dimensions, possible higher dimensions as well. a person is more advanced than a cockroach, but still cannot communicate with one. simply because a higher dimension exists and if that dimension holds beings does not hold in any way that they would try to communicate or even be aware of our existence. As the model of the universe is strikingly similar to EM, WF,SF,G...such are models of the molecular development, mitosis may resemble the seemingly erratic actions of photon(+) Electrons(-) and neutrons(0).

Theory: (similar to M Theory but not congenial to it) 2 dimensional plane can hold multi dimensional levels. objects appear smaller as you move away from them, they do not change structure, it is simply that they cannot be viewed correctly from so far away. The same could be concluded about the universe or even the dimensions through which we are able to see or affect.

If relativity better explains the universe than does Newtonian physics, String and M:Theory should also be considered. Newton and Einstein both tackled the force of Gravity, String theory originally leaves out the force of gravity altogether, claiming it as too weak of a force. -sub note on this point Electromagnetism is 10^39 times stronger than gravity, to give an example; the reason one does not fall through the earth is because EM force repels objects of mass from each other. So when you 'touch' the ground it is actually the electrons opposing the photons and pushing them away from each other- M:theory brings about gravity as being a stronger force than may be measurable because of our perception or placement in the 3rd dimension, although being able to, at least for now, see the 4th dimension. Strings in M:theory are made into more idealistic principles, basically M:theory breaks the universe down into 5 or 1 theories, and sets them on a plane similar to the conjecture in the above paragraph. If our universe exists on a 2 dimensional plane, then it seems reasonable that other universes exists parallel to one another. it's as if there is a wire far off in the distance, that wire is seen as a line to one viewer, but with you come within 1/4 of an inch to it's surface, one sees that it has 3 dimensions, and that it also has winding dimensions inside of that. If this can be seen, then it makes sense that the universe we see of 3 plus one dimensions, might exist on a smaller plane with higher planes below that and above ours. Also if the 4th dimension cannot be interacted with by our conscious being (and from the perspective of this author, it can be interacted with by the collective unconscious) then might it also reflect that other dimensions exist so close to our physical selves that they go unnoticed. These might be able to be probed as was discussed earlier, instead of monitored.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home